Overall rank: 58%
This company provides poor xHTML/ CSS coding service. There were not enough JavaScript to perform a JS analysis, what is more, almost all the tests got failed, except the browser awarness one. Another thing that we do not like is lack of company info, as well as unclear pricing information. We do not suggest.
Company info
Owner: Unknown
Country: Probably Australia
Pricing
First page: $60
Next pages: $60
Hidden costs:Unclear
xHTML analysis 49%
Doctype: Transitional
Errors: Yes
Cleanliness: Above average
Indents: Average
Headings: Bad
Image handling: Above average
Text/code ratio: 18%
CSS analysis 50%
Errors: No
Cleanliness: Great
Indents: Bad
Print version: No
Inline: Yes
Sprite usage: Bad
Position: Great
JavaScript analysis
There is not enough data to analyse.
Efficiency 64%
Compression: No
Cache: No
Bad requests: Yes
Error page: No
Page size: 86 kB
- xHTML: 10 kB
- CSS: 8 kB
- JavaScript: 0 kB
- Images: 68 kB
Number of requests: 26
- xHTML: 1
- CSS: 1
- JavaScript: 0
- Images: 24
Search engine preparation 50%
Unique titles: Yes
Canonicalization: No
Robots: Yes
XML sitemaps: Yes
Favicon: No
Expire tags: Yes
Language: English
Microformats: No
Accessibility: No
Browser awareness 83%
Firefox: Yes
Chrome: Yes
Opera: Yes
Safari: Yes
Internet Explorer 9: Yes
Internet Explorer 8: Yes
Internet Explorer 7: Yes
Internet Explorer 6: Yes
Compatibility view: No
Fixes via: External CSS