Overall rank: 55%
We should not compare webdesign to code quality, shoud we? That would definitely be unprofessional attitude so let's ignore the medieval design of this company and focus on the code quality. We were a bit surprised because we had been expecting much worse total rating. Anyways, that is not the right company to choose, even if You have limited budget.
Unfortunately, HTMLG does not exist anymore.
Company info 
Owner: Unknown
Country: Unknown
Pricing
First page: $50
Next pages: $25
Hidden costs:No
xHTML analysis 59%
Doctype: Strict
Errors: Yes
Cleanliness: Bad
Indents: Bad
Headings: Great
Image handling: Below average
Text/code ratio: 20%
CSS analysis 59%
Errors: No
Cleanliness: Above average
Indents: Bad
Print version: No
Inline: No
Sprite usage: Bad
Position: Great
JavaScript analysis 33%
Cleanliness:Bad
Inline:Yes
JS off version:No
JS efficiency:Bad
Position:Great
Efficiency 79%
Compression: Partial
Cache: No
Bad requests: No
Error page: No
Page size: 48 kB
- xHTML: 3 kB
- CSS: 4 kB
- JavaScript: 5 kB
- Images: 36 kB
Number of requests: 17
- xHTML: 1
- CSS: 1
- JavaScript: 1
- Images: 14
Search engine preparation 63%
Unique titles: Yes
Canonicalization: Yes
Robots: Yes
XML sitemaps: No
Favicon: Yes
Expire tags: Yes
Language: English
Microformats: No
Accessibility: No
Browser awareness 89%
Firefox: Yes
Chrome: Yes
Opera: Yes
Safari: Yes
Internet Explorer 9: Yes
Internet Explorer 8: Yes
Internet Explorer 7: Yes
Internet Explorer 6: Yes
Compatibility view: No
Fixes via: CSS