Overall rank: 44%
First time we tested HTML Angels in April and it received a very poor rank equal 39%. In July design changed and we have to say that it looks outstanding and professional! We had been so happy to redo our analysis to give a better rank, but we was disappointed.. actually only few things got improved, the rank now is 44% which is still too bad to promote this company. Maybe in the future..
Pricing
First page: $70
Next pages: $40
Hidden costs:Yes
xHTML analysis 70%
Doctype: HTML5
Errors: Yes
Cleanliness: Great
Indents: Great
Headings: Great
Image handling: Great
Text/code ratio: 28%
CSS analysis 69%
Errors: No
Cleanliness: Average
Indents: Bad
Print version: No
Inline: No
Sprite usage: Great
Position: Great
JavaScript analysis 33%
Cleanliness:Above average
Inline:Yes
JS off version:Yes
JS efficiency:Above average
Position:Average
Efficiency 43%
Compression: No
Cache: No
Bad requests: No
Error page: No
Page size: 698 kB
- xHTML: 4 kB
- CSS: 42 kB
- JavaScript: 110 kB
- Images: 542 kB
Number of requests: 34
- xHTML: 1
- CSS: 4
- JavaScript: 5
- Images: 24
Search engine preparation 22%
Unique titles: No
Canonicalization: No
Robots: No
XML sitemaps: No
Favicon: Yes
Expire tags: Yes
Language: htmlangels
Microformats: No
Accessibility: No
Browser awareness 63%
Firefox: Yes
Chrome: Yes
Opera: Yes
Safari: Yes
Internet Explorer 9: Yes
Internet Explorer 8: Yes
Internet Explorer 7: Yes
Internet Explorer 6: No
Compatibility view: No
Fixes via: External CSS