Overall rank: 43%
Once we saw company name, we expected to get at least better than average score. Unfortunately, the only "elite" thing we could find was a company name. Our overall experience with their markup were definitely worse. Sad, because design is pretty nice!
Pricing
There is no pricing info.
xHTML analysis 33%
Doctype: HTML5
Errors: Yes
Cleanliness: Below average
Indents: Bad
Headings: Average
Image handling: Average
Text/code ratio: 8%
CSS analysis 23%
Errors: Yes
Cleanliness: Average
Indents: Bad
Print version: No
Inline: Yes
Sprite usage: Below average
Position: Great
JavaScript analysis 20%
Cleanliness:Below average
Inline:Yes
JS off version:No
JS efficiency:Bad
Position:Great
Efficiency 83%
Compression: Yes
Cache: Yes
Bad requests: No
Error page: Yes
Page size: 473 kB
- xHTML: 7 kB
- CSS: 38 kB
- JavaScript: 137 kB
- Images: 291 kB
Number of requests: 39
- xHTML: 1
- CSS: 7
- JavaScript: 13
- Images: 18
Search engine preparation 75%
Unique titles: Yes
Canonicalization: Yes
Robots: Yes
XML sitemaps: Yes
Favicon: Yes
Expire tags: Yes
Language: English
Microformats: No
Accessibility: No
Browser awareness 61%
Firefox: Yes
Chrome: Yes
Opera: Yes
Safari: Yes
Internet Explorer 9: Yes
Internet Explorer 8: Yes
Internet Explorer 7: No
Internet Explorer 6: No
Compatibility view: No
Fixes via: External CSS