Overall rank: 50%
The only thing that slightly increased the rating is xHTML one. All other gave very poor effects, starting from Efficiency and SEO around 20%, through CSS with 43%, ending with browser awareness and lack of IE6/7 support. What is more, there is no company, as well as pricing information. We was not able to perform JS test but we assume it would lower the rank even more.
Pricing
There is no pricing info.
xHTML analysis 86%
Doctype: Transitional
Errors: No
Cleanliness: Above average
Indents: Average
Headings: Great
Image handling: Average
Text/code ratio: 25%
CSS analysis 43%
Errors: No
Cleanliness: Average
Indents: Bad
Print version: No
Inline: No
Sprite usage: Bad
Position: Great
JavaScript analysis
There is not enough data to analyse.
Efficiency 25%
Compression: No
Cache: No
Bad requests: No
Error page: No
Page size: 307 kB
- xHTML: 6 kB
- CSS: 10 kB
- JavaScript: 0 kB
- Images: 291 kB
Number of requests: 43
- xHTML: 1
- CSS: 2
- JavaScript: 0
- Images: 40
Search engine preparation 22%
Unique titles: No
Canonicalization: No
Robots: No
XML sitemaps: Yes
Favicon: No
Expire tags: Yes
Language: Spanish
Microformats: No
Accessibility: No
Browser awareness 56%
Firefox: Yes
Chrome: Yes
Opera: Yes
Safari: Yes
Internet Explorer 9: Yes
Internet Explorer 8: Yes
Internet Explorer 7: No
Internet Explorer 6: No
Compatibility view: No
Fixes via: No fixes